El Problema de ORACLE [LINK] [IOTA] [ETH]

Bambino

Megahash
Hodler
Veterano
Desde
7 May 2020
Mensajes
1,332
Puntuación
3,362
Joper....vaya una mancha negra en el hilo.....

Al final la verdad siempre sale a la luz y se ha demostrado que era un ataque contra link y no contentos con eso, ahora dicen que nexo está detrás.

Ambas llegaron a un acuerdo para trabajar conjuntamente hace bien poquito y ya sabemos la cantidad de fake news que existen.

Desde el telegram de nexo indicaron lo siguiente:

“ Hi there, I would like to address the fake news (aka "FUD" in crypto terms) that is seemingly making people jump into unreasonable conclusions.

The LINK fud report, which by the way I and the team also received on Friday and brought to the Sergey’s attention asap, is basically a cheap attempt at Chainlink’s and Nexo’s joint efforts and good work.

Nexo has nothing to do with this and its author is trying to insinuate such a connection through false flag stuff that Nexo is somehow involved. The most probable explanation is that we are Chainlink’s most recent partnership, we have staff who are well versed on the Chainlink subject, and because our OTC desks deals in LINK indeed. I hope you are all smarter than to fall for this textbook trick: What is a false flag? How state-based hackers cover their tracks

Nexo is a huge fan of ChainLink and LINK, and all that Sergey is doing for the blockchain space. Our teams communicate with Sergey on a regular basis, including yesterday, and worked for months to research and add LINK as an asset on the Nexo platform for both Borrow and Earn. We further did not spare funds and efforts to do a full-blown PR and marketing campaign for the announcement as you have probably seen. I would personally like to think that Nexo has actually done its part in helping LINK's price lately.

The Nexo enterprise has grown substantially over the past 2.5 years and is now a complex operation offering a suite of financial services for close to a million of retail, corporate and institutional clients. So the needs of our users go in many directions and we always try to do our best to serve those needs whether they are in the form of our loans, the earn interest products, custody, or prime brokerage services.

We work with DeFi projects all the time and we participate frequently both directly and on behalf of clients in the DeFi (and OTC) lending and trading arena and Nexo is basically a DeFi-whale. If you check our history, you will see our $100+ million worth of transactions with the leading DeFi projects.

The same is true for our dealings with centralized exchange venues - we are not in the trading business and do not make directional bets on cryptoassets. Our business, however, requires us to keep assets on exchanges so that they can be used by our smart order router for liquidation purposes, market-neutral strategies such as arbitrage opportunities, market making, etc.

If prices were to drop sharply, as they frequently have after steep rallies, we need to have instant API access to sell assets in order to protect our loan book and investors, just as we did back in March (Why Liquidations Are Needed and How They Protect Us All).

The Typeform in question (now taken down from the “fund” website) is indeed Nexo's and during the past years has been used on thousands of occasions by our team for all kinds of marketing purposes to collect emails on various landing pages from consenting users. The form's code and URL were accessible by anyone and they could have been copied and pasted by any of its millions of recipients or visitors.

Simeon is basically LINK's biggest fan at our firm and his research even led to the risk team approving a higher LTV for the Nexo Oracle parameters for LINK. His social media appreciation of ChainLink has been out there for anybody to see and during the research phase, his team has been communicating for months with dozens of people on the LINK subject. He is currently being unjustly harassed by the LINK "marines" and is seriously distressed. For his and his family’s sake, I really would like to ask that this stops.”


Cada uno puede coger todas las noticias al respecto y hacerse su propia opinión, la mia es que tanto link como nexo han zarpado del puerto y algunos vendieron el billete creyendo que lo recomprarian más adelante más barato.

Ahora mismo link está muy fuerte y no descartaría nuevos ataques
 

Bambino

Megahash
Hodler
Veterano
Desde
7 May 2020
Mensajes
1,332
Puntuación
3,362
Al final la verdad siempre sale a la luz y se ha demostrado que era un ataque contra link y no contentos con eso, ahora dicen que nexo está detrás.

Ambas llegaron a un acuerdo para trabajar conjuntamente hace bien poquito y ya sabemos la cantidad de fake news que existen.

Desde el telegram de nexo indicaron lo siguiente:

“ Hi there, I would like to address the fake news (aka "FUD" in crypto terms) that is seemingly making people jump into unreasonable conclusions.

The LINK fud report, which by the way I and the team also received on Friday and brought to the Sergey’s attention asap, is basically a cheap attempt at Chainlink’s and Nexo’s joint efforts and good work.

Nexo has nothing to do with this and its author is trying to insinuate such a connection through false flag stuff that Nexo is somehow involved. The most probable explanation is that we are Chainlink’s most recent partnership, we have staff who are well versed on the Chainlink subject, and because our OTC desks deals in LINK indeed. I hope you are all smarter than to fall for this textbook trick: What is a false flag? How state-based hackers cover their tracks

Nexo is a huge fan of ChainLink and LINK, and all that Sergey is doing for the blockchain space. Our teams communicate with Sergey on a regular basis, including yesterday, and worked for months to research and add LINK as an asset on the Nexo platform for both Borrow and Earn. We further did not spare funds and efforts to do a full-blown PR and marketing campaign for the announcement as you have probably seen. I would personally like to think that Nexo has actually done its part in helping LINK's price lately.

The Nexo enterprise has grown substantially over the past 2.5 years and is now a complex operation offering a suite of financial services for close to a million of retail, corporate and institutional clients. So the needs of our users go in many directions and we always try to do our best to serve those needs whether they are in the form of our loans, the earn interest products, custody, or prime brokerage services.

We work with DeFi projects all the time and we participate frequently both directly and on behalf of clients in the DeFi (and OTC) lending and trading arena and Nexo is basically a DeFi-whale. If you check our history, you will see our $100+ million worth of transactions with the leading DeFi projects.

The same is true for our dealings with centralized exchange venues - we are not in the trading business and do not make directional bets on cryptoassets. Our business, however, requires us to keep assets on exchanges so that they can be used by our smart order router for liquidation purposes, market-neutral strategies such as arbitrage opportunities, market making, etc.

If prices were to drop sharply, as they frequently have after steep rallies, we need to have instant API access to sell assets in order to protect our loan book and investors, just as we did back in March (Why Liquidations Are Needed and How They Protect Us All).

The Typeform in question (now taken down from the “fund” website) is indeed Nexo's and during the past years has been used on thousands of occasions by our team for all kinds of marketing purposes to collect emails on various landing pages from consenting users. The form's code and URL were accessible by anyone and they could have been copied and pasted by any of its millions of recipients or visitors.

Simeon is basically LINK's biggest fan at our firm and his research even led to the risk team approving a higher LTV for the Nexo Oracle parameters for LINK. His social media appreciation of ChainLink has been out there for anybody to see and during the research phase, his team has been communicating for months with dozens of people on the LINK subject. He is currently being unjustly harassed by the LINK "marines" and is seriously distressed. For his and his family’s sake, I really would like to ask that this stops.”


Cada uno puede coger todas las noticias al respecto y hacerse su propia opinión, la mia es que tanto link como nexo han zarpado del puerto y algunos vendieron el billete creyendo que lo recomprarian más adelante más barato.

Ahora mismo link está muy fuerte y no descartaría nuevos ataques


Por cierto para el que no lo sepa, chainlink hizo un comunicado apoyando a nexo y continúan trabajando juntos pese a los intentos por desestabilizar a ambos
 

Adjuntos

  • CFCAED44-7AC8-42B4-93DA-DA0D93E77986.jpeg
    CFCAED44-7AC8-42B4-93DA-DA0D93E77986.jpeg
    235.5 KB · Vistas: 277

Crypto believer

Gigahash
Hodler
Veterano
Desde
31 Ene 2018
Mensajes
1,617
Puntuación
3,802
El que sacó toda esa mierda de 59 páginas muy currado y todo lo que quieras...pero muuuuuu tonto de intentar culpar a Nexo de ello...
 

mirto

Pentahash
Hodler
Veterano
Desde
21 Ene 2018
Mensajes
4,576
Puntuación
10,529
Cuando yo empece con LINK, se decía que iría a por el 3 puesto y que el 2º era posible. Parece ilógico que pueda desbancar a ETH, ya que LINK es un token de este y parece irrealizable...pero la fuerza de ChainLINK es que esta fuera de cadena mediante los oráculos

Hay un camino, que son los oráculos descentralizados. Entonces si yo quisiera tokenizar una casa, tendría que adquirir tokens de alguna red descentralizada de oráculos, y/o crear un nodo en esta red, con valor similar o superior al de la casa, para avalar la tokenización de esta casa mediante contratos inteligentes a riesgo de perder la inversión en los tokens
.
 

Adjuntos

  • 1597001902021.png
    1597001902021.png
    270.4 KB · Vistas: 278

Crea una cuenta o accede para comentar

Debes estar registrado para poder comentar

Crear cuenta

Crea una cuenta en Foro Coin

Iniciar sesión

¿Ya tienes una cuenta? Inicia sesión

Arriba